Saturday, January 21, 2006
[battle for nepal]
Topic: Nepal
Things are going badly for Nepal. The BBC reports on clashes in the streets between security forces and opposition activists who are calling for democracy. The government has set curfews, which have hurt tourism, a crucial business in Nepal.
One wonders what King Gyanendra is thinking.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
Friday, January 13, 2006
[angling for the secretary-generalship]
Topic: United Nations
Ban Ki-moon, the Foreign Minister of South Korea, is coming to the United States next week for a meeting with Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice (previous meeting pictured). He'll also be swinging through New York next Tuesday and Wednesday for a meeting with UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, whose term ends on December 31.
The race to be the next Secretary-General is on, and though Minister Ban is not yet shortlisted, he's beginning to position himself as an alternative to the Sri Lankan and Thai frontrunners, about whom no one is especially enthusiastic. (According to the geographical rotation system, the next SG should come from Asia, though the US has suggested that the rotation is less important than finding a worthy candidate.) Earlier this week, I was asked to edit talking points for Minister Ban to use at the Davos Forum, which involved a lot of "If I were Secretary-General" hypotheticals and answers to questions about multilateralism and UN reform.
It will be interesting to see how this race plays out over the next year, and to watch what becomes of Minister Ban's bid.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
Friday, December 23, 2005
[passing a resolution]
Topic: United Nations
This is a bit out of date, but that General Assembly resolution I was working on passed. The text of the resolution is still not available on the UN website, but I'll post it once it's up.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
[korean feasts and cyprus diaries]
Topic: The Mission
Unfortunately, due to the NYC transit strike, I missed last night's marathon holiday banquet. Something new under this ambassador, the banquet consisted of a lavish buffet, a raffle at which dozens of gifts were given out, and a hired master of ceremonies who conducted interviews and game show-like activities in between speeches by just about everyone. The entire affair lasted a grueling four hours, I'm told, and for obvious reasons most of it took place in Korean, so it was hard on my speechwriting colleague.
On a different note, one of the diplomats just dropped by my office with an odd holiday gift: a yearbook-sized, fake-leather-bound 2006 "Cyprus Diary" with gilt pages. Essentially a glorified day-runner, it's obviously a production of the government of Cyprus, and includes a map of the European Union (which Cyprus recently joined), a map of Cyprus itself (undivided), and pages of basic info about the country, including a lengthy section on "The Cyprus Problem," which I haven't read.
So far, though, I'm still waiting on a new wall calendar. Last year we got one from the Korea National Tourism Organization (whose URL, , has a grammatical error) and an even bigger one from Asiana Airlines. With a week to go, though, all I've got is an awkward little "Dynamic Korea" desk calendar from the Korean OverSeas (sic) Information Service.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
Friday, December 16, 2005
[just too horribly stupid]
Topic: Terrorism
Shameful. Just shameful.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
[suicide protesters]
Topic: Korean Culture
Daniel alerts me to this strange bit of news about why Hong Kong police see the 1,500 South Koreans in town as the major threat to the WTO negotiations there. Most of the piece is about South Korea's rice subsidies, but it begins with a recap of Korean WTO protests past:
At the 2003 WTO summit in Cancun, Mexico, activist Lee Kyung-hae stabbed himself to death after unfurling a banner that declared "WTO kills farmers." Early this year, in November, two more farmers committed suicide by drinking insecticide.
What the hell? I mean, this is not India, where farmers have
committed suicide rather than face impossible debts. They may have seen suicide as the only way to get the moneylenders to back off, thus saving their families from starvation. Nor are Korean farmers facing anything like the destruction that confronted
Quang Duc, the Vietnamese Buddhist monk who immolated himself in 1963 to protest the repression of his religion and his country. It's true that Korean farmers are clinging to a declining way of life, but this has largely to do with South Korea's shift from agrarian poverty to industrialized wealth. I was startled, too, that South Korean protesters would
cut off their fingers to protest Japanese claims to Dokto/Takeshima, a tiny hunk of rock in the East Sea/Sea of Japan.
So what motivates Koreans to mutilate or kill themselves for what seem like mid-level political scuffles? I honestly don't know.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
Wednesday, December 7, 2005
[let's hope they mean it]
Topic: United States
According to Condoleeza Rice, the Bush administration today changed its position on torture, finally determining that the UN Convention against Torture, which bans "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" of prisoners, applies even to US personnel even outside of US territory — an interpretation that has been glaringly obvious to everyone else all along.
Let's just hope that we actually adhere to this new public policy. It wouldn't surprise me in the least to discover that while we're now officially swearing off such behavior, it's still going on in secret.
Update: Sadly, it looks like I (and much of the media) jumped the gun on this one. My friend Daniel Kleinfeld posted a couple of clarifying links in the comments, including this one, which explains that Condi's language has been in use by the administration for some time and does nothing to stop or prevent the continued torture of those we have imprisoned without anything resembling due process.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
View Comments (2) |
[where morality comes from]
Topic: Society
A group called The Atheist Agenda, out of the University of Texas at San Antonio, has gotten national media attention for its "Smut for Smut" program, in which they set up a table and offered to give pornography to anyone who traded in a Bible or another religious tome. It's a stunt, clearly, but meant to demonstrate that there's a lot of dirty business in the Bible, which makes it a questionable basis for morality.
The group's president, Thomas Jackson, was recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson on MSNBC's The Situation, and it turns out (no surprise) that Jackson has thought through his position more carefully than Carlson. Said Jackson:
Morality is not derived from religious texts. Religious texts actually contradict each other. If you read the Bible, it contradicts itself on nearly every page. And the fact that people can decide which one to go with shows that they are getting their morality from somewhere else ....
[Morality is] based off of things that are good for society. If citizens murder each other, this is bad for society. And you see this across the board in many nations.
Several religions have stumbled upon this, but it's not the religious text that's bringing this to people. They are finding this on their own, and societies that don't find this don't survive.
Brilliant. This is a very clear summation of an argument that I've often had with religious people who believe that morality is only possible if you believe in God. Indeed, this is so obvious that Talmudic rabbis differentiated between those laws between man and man whose purposes could be rationally understood, and those between man and God, which may or may not lend themselves to human understanding.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
[how to ruin a negotiation]
Topic: North Korea
So the new American ambassador to South Korea, Alexander Vershbow, announced his presence by calling North Korea a criminal regime.
Okay, so North Korea did manage to poke America in the eye, which is what triggered Vershbow's harsh words. North Korea insisted that the US lift economic sanctions, threatening to walk out of the negotiations if we didn't. So Vershbow as explaining why we weren't going to back down on this issue:
This is a criminal regime, and we can't somehow remove our sanctions as a political gesture when this regime is engaging in dangerous activities such as weapons exports to rogue states, narcotics trafficking as a state activity and counterfeiting of our money on a large scale.
Nevertheless, it was totally unnecessary to poke back. We could have said simply that the sanctions, like everything else, could be discussed at the Six-Party Talks once North Korea has dismantled its nuclear program.
Unfortunately, as has so often been the case with the Bush administration, we seem to have decided that a tough stance was worth more than actual progress. What did we gain with our tough talk? If North Korea walks out on the negotiations, we will have succeeded in highlighting our impotence on the Korean Peninsula.
Whatever happened to walking softly and carrying a big stick? At the moment, our big stick is looking stretched and fragile in Iraq, and still our government insists on shouting when a few quiet words would do.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
Monday, December 5, 2005
[collective everything]
Topic: North Korea
Slate today has a photo essay on North Korea. Nothing earth-shattering here, but notice that every single picture emphasizes collective activity. In North Korea, no one is ever alone.
| Permalink |
Share This Post |
Post Comment |
| Newer | Latest | Older |